All three new Pacers rookies played in their first Summer League game against the Orlando Magic, a 86-77 victory.

Second round pick Lance Stephenson impressed the most with 21 points on 8 of 10 shooting to lead the way.  10th overall pick Paul George struggled from the field but was perfect from the line en route to 12 points, while 51st pick Magnum Rolle had 13 points and 5 boards.

Nothing to start spraying your pants over, but a win is a win, even if it is in the Summer League where almost nothing ever translates to the regular season.  Nevertheless, it's good to let these rookies get a bit of a run and see how they perform against their peers.  Hopefully they can keep this up and make things interesting.

As promised, here is a quick round up of the Indiana Pacers' 2010 NBA Draft and what I thought of it.

Everything pretty much went according to plan on 24 June 2010 when Washington selected John Wall with the first pick and Philadelphia picked Evan Turner.

The focus leading up to the draft for the Pacers was a selecting a PG of the future.  Well, they did select a PG, but it wasn't a point guard.  With the 10th overall pick, the Pacers selected Paul George, a small forward from Fresno State.

Then in the second round, they picked up shooting guard Lance Stephenson with the 40th overall pick.  They then traded up with the 57th pick (acquired through the Shawne Williams deal) and cash to Oklahoma City to acquire Magnum Rolle, a power forward, with the 51st overall pick.

So instead of the point guard of the future, the Pacers ended up with a small forward, a shooting guard and a power forward, the three most stacked positions on the roster.

Overall

From an overall perspective, this was a disappointing draft for me.  I, like most Pacers fans, expected the franchise to pick a point guard like Eric Bledsoe (Wall's running mate at Kentucky) or Avery Bradley (from Texas), the second best options after John Wall.

However, the Pacers didn't feel either player was worth the 10th pick and they didn't deem it necessary to (or weren't able to) trade down for them.

Paul George has already signed a two-year deal, and while neither second rounder has inked in a deal yet, it looks like they are all here to stay, at least for now.

Originally, I expected the Pacers to make a few moves during the free agent signing period (which has commenced), but this is looking increasingly unlikely.

So unless a miracle can be pulled off with some amazing trade or signing, it looks like the Pacers are stuck with TJ Ford for another year, who we all know is not the answer at point guard and never will be.  Earl Watson will probably be gone shortly, and in any case, he wasn't the solution either.  Lance Stephenson could play some PG (and has been trialled at that position in camp), but few expect him to be capable of being a starting point guard in the NBA.

Paul George

In a Bleacher Report article I prepared a while back, I named George as one of the most underrated prospects of the draft.  But I didn't expect any team, least of all the Pacers, to select him as high as number 10.

Don't get me wrong, George is a solid pick with upside.  He can shoot with range, take it too the basket, and can be a capable defender in the league.  At 6-9 and and 214 lbs, he has an NBA body.  The sophomore from Fresno State averaged 16.8 points, 7.2 rebounds and 3.0 assists last season.  I even said he could be this year's Danny Granger.

The problem is, the Pacers already have a Danny Granger on the team.  At the wing positions they also have Mike Dunleavy Jr, Dahntay Jones and Brandon Rush.  Unless one or two of these guys go, where are they going to find playing time for this promising player who is supposed to "contribute right away?"

Or does this mean Danny Granger is now likely to be traded?  Unless he can get the team someone like Chris Paul (super unlikely), I highly doubt it.

Lance Stephenson

The Pacers were surprised that a player of Stephenson's calibre was still available at the 40th pick, so they snapped him up.  There is a good reason why the freshman from Cincinatti, who was ranked coming up in roughly the same class as Stephon Marbury and Sebastian Telfair, slipped so much in the draft: teams think he is bad news.

Stephenson has had a few run-ins with the law before, which is what makes this pick such a head scratcher as Larry Bird had been desperately getting rid of knuckleheads the last couple of years.

To me, it looks like Larry Legend is swinging for the fences with this pick.  If Stephenson turns out to be a real steal, then he'll look like a genius.  If he turns out to be another Shawne Williams, at least Larry is being consistent.

Stephenson is 6-5 or so, and doesn't have the explosive athleticism of a lot of NBA guards.  But at 227 lbs, he manages to overpower a lot of the weaker, smaller players.  Not sure if this will be enough for him in the NBA, but the Pacers seem to be impressed with him.  He averaged 12.3 points, 5.4 rebounds and 2.5 assists last season.

Stephenson also faces the same problem as George on the wing (ie finding playing time).  If he ends up at the end of the bench for long periods of time, which he probably will, I just hope he doesn't end up being a distraction.

Magnum Rolle

The guy with probably the coolest name in the draft is a 6-11, 220 lb power forward that goes for every loose ball.  Exactly the kind of player the Pacers need with Jeff Foster in decline.

Apparently, Rolle has been tearing it up in camp (according to this Indystar article), being by far the most dominant player amongst the Pacers' draft picks.  I will take this with a grain of salt because many players have done well in camp and then do nothing when they're given proper playing time.

Rolle is 24-years-old, so his upside is more limited than the other guys, but he could end up being a steal.  The Pacers obviously think so, having traded up for him.

However, will Rolle get any playing time behind Troy Murphy, Jeff Foster, Solomon Jones and Josh McRoberts?  And what about last year's power forward selection, Tyler Hansbrough?  Having missed so much time last season, this will almost be like another rookie campaign for Hansbrough.  Can a guy like Rolle, who, let's not forget, is the 51st pick, challenge these players for court time?  Very pessimistic about his chances.

Conclusion

I think all three guys (George, Stephenson and Rolle) are solid selections, but I have doubts that they are the right selections for the Indiana Pacers at this point in time.  What they really need is a starting point guard, or at least someone that can become a starting point guard in a couple of years.

Instead, they drafted three somewhat promising players in their most stacked positions, who will all struggle to find playing time behind more experienced veterans.  I don't care who it is, but someone has to go.  It'll be interesting to see if the Pacers can pull something off before the start of next season.  For the sake of all the fans, I sure hope so.

We're back!  Apologies for the long delay.  This server transfer thing has not only been long and arduous, it has also lost a lengthy post on the Pacers' draft picks (Paul George, Lance Stephenson and Magnum Rolle).  In the meantime, the franchise also picked up a new assistant coach in former Celtic Walter McCarthy.

Don't despair, I'll throw in my two cents on all of these movements shortly.

Stay tuned!

As a follow up to Josh's post on Epke Udoh, I've decided to throw my own two cents worth into the debate on who the Pacers should draft with the 10th pick.

I'm pretty torn about this year's pick myself.  I don't think there is anyone out there at the 10th spot that will help the team immediately or even in a year or two, and that's what the struggling franchise needs.

Granger appears to have peaked and Hibbert is the only guy who is showing solid signs of growth.  Rush gets one more year to prove himself before he is officially a bust (some say that's being too generous).  Hansbrough deserves a couple more years but his upside is limited.  Jones is NOT the answer at shooting guard.  Not by a long shot.

The biggest issue is still the point guard position.  Ford needs to go -- he's had his chance and even when he plays well he's only playing well individually, not helping the Pacers become a better team.  Price is a great pick-up for a 2nd rounder, but he's not the future, especially with this knee injury that will set him back next season.  The team needs a lot of help, and it starts at point guard.

However, I'm not sure Eric Bledsoe or Avery Bradley is the answer.  They are not projected to go as high as 10th anyway.  Most guys projected to go around the 10th pick (in order of best available player) are power forwards, and the Pacers already have Murphy, Hansbrough, Jones and Foster.  None of these guys are the future at that position.  Hansbrough could be if a miracle happens, but that's drawing a very long bow.

That's what makes this 10th pick so frustrating.  If only the Pacers followed the lead of other teams and tanked those last few weeks (and by that I simply mean giving more time to youngsters), they could have had a much more meaningful and valuable pick.  In my view, the Pacers should either:

(1) trade down for Bledsoe or Bradley and hope for the best (but only for a future first round pick -- the odds of getting a useful second round pick like AJ Price are too rare); or

(2) take a gamble and use the 10th pick to get a player with tremendous upside -- someone that will probably either be a star or bust.  Hassan Whiteside perhaps?

I say this because the Pacers need REAL help -- a player that can turn the fortunes of the franchise around, and do it either in a hurry or give the fans hope that it will happen some day in the not too distant future.  I think it's worth taking the gamble because the team can't keep going on like this, stuck in a perpetual cycle of underachievement and underwhelming draft picks.  The last thing the team needs is another "solid rotation player" or "piece of the puzzle" that will do nothing except ensure that the team remains horribly mediocre.  I'm not excepting a miracle, but Bird needs to roll the dice to at least give fans some hope.

The Pacers have three big problems in fixing things up though: (a) they don't have any players that other teams really want; (b) you could probably count Granger and Hibbert as trade assets but there's nothing Bird can get back for them that will make the team significantly better; and (c) even when cap room frees up the season after next, the team will struggle to sign marquee players as they will flee to the bigger markets.

That's why I say we need to take a risk this season.  I would rather see Bird go all out and fail than him do nothing material for yet another season.